Hi everyone, welcome to this week’s post which is the last post for portfolio 2. In this post I will be discussing the misuse of social technology.
A number of companies have encountered serious ethical issues because misusing social technology. Some of these companies have gone through this accidentally while some have deliberately misused social technology (Dail, 2014). The introduction and advancement in the number of social technology, and how various companies use it is throughout. So many people believe that companies have to embrace the use of the numerous social technologies. However, this is always practiced with a lot of caution as it can always boomerang on the image of the company should it be “misused.” A good example of such companies that have become a victim is American Medical Response (AMR). This paper details out how AMR ‘misused’ social technology from an ethical perspective.
American Medical Response is a renowned medical and ambulance service provider that is in United States. It is as a major provider and manager of medical transportation. AMR is a leading provider of dispatch service and emergency response, air ambulance, non-emergency transport, event medical, EMT training, and managed transportation services (AMR, 2014). The company is fully operated in up to 42 states including District of Columbia. The business has provided an inordinate opportunity for advancement and growth in numerous career paths. According to AMR website (2014), this has been made much easier by the fact that AMR is largest provider of transportation of medical services in the entire nation. AMR’S public image has earned it so much trust from potential customers and experts. So many people have cherished working with American Medical Response due to how it has related with its staffs. American Medical Response has the best ethical codes of conduct, which has related so well with the public, suppliers, and customers.
How American Medical Response ‘Misused’ Social Technology
Even with a good name that AMR has been enjoying, that had to face a legal battle for what was considered unlawful firing of one of their staffs. AMR fired one of the employees for allegedly posting what was perceived to be defamatory comments about her immediate supervisor on Facebook (Dail, 2014). The decision to fire the employee was in line with the company’s social media policy that prohibited employees from posting defamatory, prejudiced, and or disparaging comments intended to discuss managers, company, or even competitors on any social media. The outrageous post that was made by an employee was purely against the company policy and warranted such punishment.
National Labor Relation Board (NLRB) decided to file a case protesting the action that was taken by American Medical Response. In their case, NLRB argued that the action taken by AMR to fire their employee was illegal (Bloomberg, 2011). The explanation is that employees have the right to discuss the state of their working conditions at whatever place they wish, and that going to Facebook was no different from discussing that on a lunch table. The argument is that the policy set by any company must not be overbroad and try to control speech that is. The policy placed much emphasis on Facebook rather than what was said and its intent, which was wrong according to NLRB (Melick & Wall, 2014).
Such situations can be avoided by companies as they result to unnecessary losses by financially and even on the image of the firm (Anne, 2014). The best way to avoid a similar occurrence is by ensuring that only protective languages are and that the right of employees and the set policies are reviewed after a period of two years.
References
AMR. (n.d.). Keep up with American Medical Response. LinkedIn. Retrieved September 24, 2014 from: https://www.linkedin.com/company/american-medical-response-1
Anne, C. (2014). Drafting social media policies in light of recent NLRB decisions. Find law. Retrieved from: http://technology.findlaw.com/modern-law-practice/drafting-social-media-policies-in-light-of-recent-nlrb-decisions.html#sthash.qIrvleAr.dpuf
Bloomberg. (2011). Company Settles Case in Firing Tied to Facebook. Business Daily. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/business/08labor.html?_r=0
Dail, G. (2014). Social media policies: impact of the American medical response case.The HR Group Inc. Retrieved from: http://www.thehrgroupinc.net/social-media-policies-impact-of-the-american-medical-response-case/
Melick, H., & Wall, E. (2014). Technology: What is concerted social media activity under the NLRA. InsideCounsel. Retrieved from: http://www.insidecounsel.com/2014/01/31/technology-what-is-concerted-social-media-activity
















